Guns and Abortion

Artificial Intelligence is currently a media darling. When they’re not talking AI, the rest of the news is dominated by abortion and guns. I wanted to write a learned essay about the similarities in the arguments for both. But then I thought that it might be better to let AI do the work for me. So I fired up Google’s Bard and posed the question:

Aren’t pro-choice and pro-gun arguments basically the same?

I got my choice of three different responses. They are listed below. They are largely thoughtful, well-argued and generally better than what I was going to say. I was a bit disappointed that, in each draft, there was some weaseling at the end instructing the reader to respect the rights and opinions of others. Pure corporate-speak already enshrined at the beginning of the AI age…

Bard Draft 1:

Pro-choice and pro-gun arguments are often seen as being on opposite sides of the political spectrum, but there are some similarities between the two. Both sides believe in individual rights, and both sides believe that the government should not interfere in people’s personal lives.

Pro-choice advocates believe that women have the right to make their own decisions about their bodies, including the decision to have an abortion. They argue that abortion is a private medical procedure that should be between a woman and her doctor, and that the government should not have the right to interfere.

Pro-gun advocates believe that people have the right to own guns, and that this right is protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. They argue that guns are necessary for self-defense, and that they are a deterrent to crime.

Both sides of these arguments have strong feelings about their beliefs, and there is often a lot of passion on both sides. It is important to remember that these are complex issues with no easy answers, and that it is possible to respect the beliefs of others even if you do not agree with them.

Bard Draft 2:

Pro-choice and pro-gun arguments are often framed as being about individual rights, but there are some key differences between the two.

Pro-choice arguments are based on the idea that women have the right to control their own bodies and make their own decisions about their reproductive health. Pro-gun arguments are based on the idea that people have the right to own guns for self-defense and other purposes.

One key difference between the two is that the right to abortion is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, while the right to bear arms is. This means that the Supreme Court has ruled that the right to abortion is not a fundamental right, while the right to bear arms is.

Another key difference is that the issue of abortion is more divisive than the issue of gun control. This is because abortion is a moral issue, while gun control is more of a practical issue.

Despite these differences, there are some similarities between pro-choice and pro-gun arguments. Both sides argue that their rights are being infringed upon by the government. Both sides also believe that they are fighting for a just cause.

Ultimately, the question of whether or not pro-choice and pro-gun arguments are basically the same is a matter of opinion. There are certainly some similarities between the two, but there are also some key differences.

Bard Draft 3:

Pro-choice and pro-gun arguments are similar in that they both involve a fundamental right to self-determination. Pro-choice advocates believe that women have the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion, while pro-gun advocates believe that people have the right to own guns. Both of these rights are protected by the Constitution, and both sides of the debate have passionate arguments in support of their position.

However, there are also some important differences between the two issues. Abortion is a medical procedure that involves the termination of a pregnancy. Guns are weapons that can be used to kill people. These are two very different things, and it is important to keep that in mind when considering the arguments on both sides of the debate.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to have an abortion is a personal one that should be made by the woman involved. The decision of whether or not to own a gun is also a personal one that should be made by the individual. There is no right or wrong answer to either of these questions, and it is important to respect the rights of others to make their own choices.

Here are some of the arguments in favor of pro-choice:

  • Women have the right to bodily autonomy. This means that they have the right to make decisions about their own bodies, including whether or not to have an abortion.
  • Abortion is a safe and legal medical procedure. It is performed by doctors in hospitals and clinics all over the world.
  • Banning abortion would not stop women from having abortions. It would only make them less safe.
  • Women should have the right to make their own decisions about their lives, including whether or not to have children.

Here are some of the arguments in favor of pro-gun:

  • The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms.
  • Guns are a deterrent to crime. Criminals are less likely to target people who they know may be armed.
  • Guns can be used for self-defense. If someone is attacked, they have the right to defend themselves with a gun.
  • Guns are a part of American culture. They are used for hunting, target shooting, and collecting.

It is important to note that these are just some of the arguments on both sides of the debate. There are many other arguments that could be made, and it is up to each individual to decide which arguments they find most persuasive.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top
Skip to content